Home Releases 2022, №3 (47)

V. I. IKSKUL VON HILDENBANDT AND HER SALON

History of Russia: from ancient times to 1917 , UDC: 94(47).083 DOI: 10.25688/20-76-9105.2022.47.3.07

Authors

  • Stogov Dmitry I. Candidate of Historical Sciences

Annotation

The study of the activities of political salons seems relevant, as it helps to identify unofficial political ties that existed in the Russian Empire in the late XIX – early XX century. Among the St. Petersburg aristocratic salons of that time a special place was occupied by the salon of baroness Varvara Ivanovna Ikskul von Hildenbandt (1850–1928). Literary and political evenings, usually held on Thursdays, were attended by famous cultural figures and politicians. For the first time in historiography, archival sources (letters, telegrams) from the funds of the Manuscript Department of the Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, directly related to V. I. Ikskul, were involved. The conclusion is made about the amorphousness of the political and religious beliefs of the baroness. Having a reputation as a liberal and a supporter of the emancipation of women, Ixkul sometimes invited staunch conservatives to her meetings. Known as a follower of the teachings of L. N. Tolstoy the baroness, who harshly criticized the tsarist government, tried to exert political influence through a number of senior officials (defending Tolstoy’s teachings, obstructing the tsarist decree on the dissolution of the First State Duma, etc.), but these attempts were unsuccessful. It is emphasized that, being a bright representative of the culture of the Silver age, Ikskul can be attributed to the popular philosophical and religious movement among the intelligentsia at that time — God-seeking. In its course, one should consider the baroness Rasputin’s infatuation, his invitations to salon meetings. In modern historiography, there is a point of view that the participants of the salon used the “elder” in their political games to fight against the tsarist government. The article concludes that the baroness’ fascination with Rasputin’s personality was quite sincere and logically fit into her religious and philosophical ideas.

How to link insert

Stogov, D. I. (2022). V. I. IKSKUL VON HILDENBANDT AND HER SALON Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (47), 80. https://doi.org/10.25688/20-76-9105.2022.47.3.07
References
1. 1. Bokhanov A. N. Pravda o Grigorii Rasputine [The truth about Grigory Rasputin]. Moscow: Russkii izdatel`skii tsentr, 2011. 608 s. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Gaida F. A. «Kabinet» kniazia N. D. Golitsyna i poiski politicheskogo kursa zimoi 1916–1917 gg. [The “Cabinet” of Prince N. D. Golitsyn and the search for a political course in the winter of 1916–1917] // Rossiiskaia istoriia. 2020. № 1. P. 75–90. DOI: 10.31857/S086956870008272-0. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Korostelev O. A. Krug Merezhkovskikh o Vl. Solov’eve do revoliutsii i v emigratsii [The Merezhkovsky circle about V. Solovyov before the revolution and in emigration] // Solov’evskie issledovaniia. 2018. Vyp. 3 (59). P. 74–86. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Korchikova S. L. Iz istorii russkoi poezii Serebrianogo veka [From the history of Russian poetry of the Silver Age] // Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii biulleten` (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal). 1999. № 1. P. 238–244. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Kotov A. E. Konservativnye publitsisty na stranitsakh dnevnika A. V. Bogdanovich [Conservative publicists on the pages of A. V. Bogdanovich’s diary] // Sovremennaia nauka: aktual`nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2017. № 10. P. 24–30. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Kotov A. E. «Nenadezhnyi drug»: A. S. Suvorin i salon Bogdanovichei v kontse XIX v. [“Unreliable friend”: A. S. Suvorin and the Bogdanovich salon at the end of the XIX century] // Rossiiskaia istoriia. 2020. № 1. S. 107–114. DOI: 10.31857/S086956870008278-6. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Krainiukov P. E. Petrogradskaia obshchina sester miloserdiia im. general-ad”iutanta M. P. fon Kaufmana v sobytiiakh Pervoi mirovoi voiny [Petrograd Community of Sisters of Mercy named after Adjutant General M. P. von Kaufman in the events of the First World War] // Vestnik natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra N. I. Pirogova. 2017. T. 12. № 1. P. 97–102. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Leonov M. M. Rossiiskie salony vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX v.: patronat i protezhirovanie [Russian salons of the second half of the XIX – early XX centuries: patronage and prosthetics]. Samara: Izdatel’stvo SMIU, 2010. 144 p. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Mamonov A. V. Graf M. T. Loris-Melikov i salon Bogdanovichei [Count M. T. Loris-Melikov and the Bogdanovich salon] // Rossiiskaia istoriia. 2020. № 1. P. 101–107. DOI: 10.31857/S086956870008277-5. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Rozental’ I. S. Politicheskie kluby, kruzhki, salony [Political clubs, clubs, salons] // Ocherki russkoi kul`tury. Konets XIX – nachalo XX veka. T. 2. Vlast`. Obshchestvo. Kul`tura. Moscow: Izdatel`stvo MGU, 2012. P. 161–201. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Stogov D. I. Literaturno-politicheskie salony kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. v istorii Sankt-Peterburga [Literary and political salons of the late XIX – early XX centuries in the history of St. Petersburg] // Universitetskie peterburgskie chteniia / pod redaktsiei Iu.V. Krivosheeva, M. V. Khodiakova. St. Petersburg: Znamenitye universanty, 2003. P. 155–162. (In Russ.).
12. 12. Stogov D. I. Pravomonarkhicheskie salony Peterburga – Petrograda (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Right monarchical salons of St. Petersburg – Petrograd (late XIX – early XX century)]. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2007. 312 p. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Stogov D. I. Pravye kruzhki Petrograda v predrevoliutsionnoi politicheskoi bor`be (iiul` 1914 – fevral` 1917 gg.) [The right circles of Petrograd in the pre-revolutionary political struggle (July 1914 – February 1917)]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPbGETU «LETI», 2020. 281 p. (In Russ.).
14. 14. Sumburova E. I. Sestry miloserdiia Pervoi mirovoi voiny: na materialakh avtodokumental`nykh tekstov [Sisters of Mercy of the First World War: based on the materials of auto-documentary texts] // Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2019. T. 1. № 2. P. 100–108. (In Russ.).
15. 15. Shruba M. K tipologii literaturnykh ob``edinenii v dorevoliutsionnoi Rossii [On the Typology of Literary Associations in Pre-Revolutionary Russia] // Rema. Rhema. 2020. № 4. P. 23–48. DOI: 10.31862/2500-2953-2020-4-23-48. (In Russ.).
16. 16. Iakovleva T. M. Kollektsiia otkrytok sobiratel`nitsy V. P. Shneider [Collection of postcards of the collector V. P. Schneider] // Illiustrativnye kollektsii Kunstkamery / Ros. akad. nauk, Muzei antropologii i etnografii im. Petra Velikogo (Kunstkamera); [otv. red. V. A. Prishchepova]. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN, 2014. P. 378–389. (In Russ.).
Download file .pdf 317.18 kb