Home → Releases → № 3 (55) →

CRIMEAN TATAR FACTOR IN TURKISH-UKRAINIAN RELATIONS IN 1991–2014

The newest history of Russia , UDC: 94

Authors

  • Karpets Fedor V.

Annotation

The topic of the Crimean Tatar factor in Turkish-Ukrainian relations touches on several pressing problems and issues. These include interethnic contradictions, separatism, national self-determination and “soft power” in international relations. This article examines various aspects of the Crimean Tatar factor in Turkish-Ukrainian relations in 1991–2014, analyzes them, identifies their features and influence on the events that took place in the spring of 2014 in Crimea. The author concludes that the project of a Crimean Tatar national state in Crimea, carried out with the support of the Turkish Republic in 1991–2014, and with the connivance of the Ukrainian authorities, turned out to be unfeasible due to the small size of the Crimean Tatar population and the presence of Russian armed forces on the peninsula.
Tags:
“soft power” , Crimea , Crimean Spring , Crimean Tatar issue , Crimean Tatars , Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people (An extremist organization banned in Russia) , neo-Ottomanism , pan-Turkism , Turkish-Ukrainian relations

How to link insert

Karpets, F. V. (2024). CRIMEAN TATAR FACTOR IN TURKISH-UKRAINIAN RELATIONS IN 1991–2014 Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (55),
References
1. 1. Avatkov V. A. Geopoliticheskoe izmerenie turetsko-ukrainskikh otnoshenii [Geopolitical dimension of Turkish-Ukrainian relations] // Post-Soviet Studies. Vol. 4. № 4 (3). P. 219–225. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Avatkov V. A. Turetskaia respublika. Vneshniaia politika: ot 2002 k 2018: monografiia [Turkish Republic. Foreign policy: from 2002 to 2018: monograph]. Moscow: Iurait, 2020. 136 p. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Akhmadeev K. N. Krymskotatarskoe soobshchestvo sovremennoi Rossii: problema samoopredeleniia [Crimean Tatar community of modern Russia: the problem of selfdetermination]: dissertatsiia kandidata politicheskikh nauk. St. Petersburg, 2018. 183 p. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Baranov A. V. Vliianie Turtsii na postmaidannuiu Ukrainu: vneshnepoliticheskii i voennyi aspekty [Turkey’s influence on post-Maidan Ukraine: foreign policy and military aspects] // Turtsiia i slavianskii mir: voprosy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i istorikokul’turnykh sviazei: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (28 oktiabria 2016 g., Kubanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, g. Krasnodar), Krasnodar: Traditsiia, 2016. P. 117–126. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Demeshko N. E. Ukrainskie prezidenty i krymskie tatary: problemy, obeshchaniia, itogi [Ukrainian presidents and Crimean Tatars: problems, promises, results] // Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Culturology. 2018. Vol. 4 (70). № 1. P. 85–96. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Irkhin A. A., Demeshko N. E. Krymskii aspekt rossiisko-turetskikh otnoshenii: faktory «miagkoi i zhestkoi sily» [The Crimean aspect of Russian-Turkish relations: factors of “soft and hard power”] // Perspektivy. 2019. № 3. P. 37–49. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Kiseleva N. V., Mal’gin A. V., Petrov V. P., Formanchuk A. A. Etnopoliticheskie protsessy v Krymu: istoricheskii opyt, sovremennye problemy i perspektivy ikh resheniia [Ethnopolitical processes in Crimea: historical experience, modern problems and prospects for their solution]. Simferopol’: Salta, 2015. 352 p. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Riabtsev O. V. Setevoi printsip deiatel’nosti organizatsii zakrytogo tipa v kontekste ugroz natsional’noi i regional’noi bezopasnosti Rossii (na primere krymskotatarskogo natsional’nogo dvizheniia) [The network principle of the activities of closed organizations in the context of threats to the national and regional security of Russia (using the example of the Crimean Tatar national movement)]: discertatsiia kandidata politicheskikh nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008. 168 p. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Turtsiia mezhdu Evropoi i Aziei: Itogi evropeizatsii na iskhode XX v.: monografiia [Türkiye between Europe and Asia. Results of Europeanization at the end of the 20th century: monograph] / [M. Gasratian, F. Zherdev, O. Zhigalina i drugie; otvetstvennyi redaktor N. G. Kireev]; Institut vostokovedeniia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Institut izucheniia Izrailia i Blizhnego Vostoka. Moscow: Kraft+; IV RAN, 2001. 535 p. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Aksakal H. Farther neighbour: a critical estimation on Turkish reception of Ukrainian revolution and Crimean crisis // Nowy Prometeusz. 2014. № 4 (6). P. 24–37.
11. 11. Ereker F., Özer U. Crimea in Turkish-Russian relations: identity, discourse, or interdependence? // Athens Journal of Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 5. Issue 4. P. 371–388.
12. 12. Gürler R. T. Turkey’s soft power towards Central Asian countries after the cold war // Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University Social Sciences Journals. 2013. Vol. 1–2. P. 100–113.
13. 13. Sezer D. B. Ukraine, Turkey and the Black Sea Region // Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 1996. Vol. 20. P. 79–101.
14. 14. Williams B. G. The Crimean Tatars: the diaspora experience and the forging of a nation. Leiden; Boston; Koln: Brill, 2001. 489 p.
Download file .pdf 409.38 kb