Home Releases 2021, №3 (43)

QUESTIONS OF CULTURAL AND CIVIC IDENTITY IN MODERN HISTORICAL EDUCATION

Methods of teaching history , UDC: 37.016:94(470) DOI: 10.25688/20-76-9105.2021.43.3.8

Authors

  • Tokareva Elena Anatolievna docent, Ph. D. (History)

Annotation

The research is devoted to the study of crucial issues related to the formation of cultural and civic identity in the XXI century. The basis of this research is a critical analysis of legislative documents and scientific works of modern Russian and foreign scientists. The article considers the main approaches to the understanding of identity, reveals the features of the formation of civil and cultural identity in the historical education of modern Russia. The goal is to identify the basis of cultural and civic identity. Results. There is a need to clarify the existing approaches to understanding civil and cultural identity, to search for new meanings in filling the concept of identity. The researching direction, which takes into account not only political, social, cultural, but also historical components of identity, seems promising. The existing approaches to the analysis of identity in science are focused and identified on participation in society. It is obvious that identity, first of all, is the awareness of one’s belonging to society. Taking into account this cognitive component, the role of education, primarily historical, increases. Historical identity is formed primarily when studying the courses of the new and modern history of Russia: students begin to realize their belonging to the history of their own country, involvement in the experience of generations, to the epochs of the past. Historical identity becomes the basis for the formation and development of cultural and civic identity. At this moment, there is a threat of forming a negative identity among young people: a large number of texts have been published in public access on the Internet, which present a dangerous “ideological” interpretation of the history of Russia. State and administrative regulation of this process can remove the threat of forming a negative civil and cultural identity of modern Russian youth.

How to link insert

Tokareva, E. A. (2021). QUESTIONS OF CULTURAL AND CIVIC IDENTITY IN MODERN HISTORICAL EDUCATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №3 (43), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.25688/20-76-9105.2021.43.3.8
References
1. 1. Astashkin, D. (2015). Imperskii kontinuitet v poslevoennoi sovetskoi propagande [Imperial Continuity in Post-War Soviet Propaganda]. Zhurnal rossiiskikh i vostochnoevropeiskikh istoricheskikh issledovanii [Journal of the Russian and East European Historical Studies], 6 (1), 124–132 (in Russian).
2. 2. Gaberkorn, A. I. (2018). Patriotizm i formirovanie grazhdanskoi identichnosti v politicheskom soznanii naseleniia Iugry [Patriotism and the Formation of Civil Identity in the Political Consciousness of the Population of Ugra]. Teorii i problemy politicheskikh issledovanii [Theories and Problems of Political Studies], 7 (5A), 137–147 (in Russian).
3. 3. Goncharenko, L. N., & Avakova, E. B. (2019). Istoricheskaia samoidentifi-katsiia Rossii: etapy stanovleniia i sovremennye funktsii [Historical Self-Identification of Russia: Stages of Formation And Modern Functions]. Lokus: liudi, obshchestvo, kul’tury, smysly [Locus: People, Society, Cultures, Meaning], (2), 132–147 (in Russian).
4. 4. Goncharova, I. K., & Lipets, E. Iu. (2019). K opredeleniiu poniatiia «kul’turnaia identichnost’» v kontekste globalizatsii [On Defining the Concept “Cultural Identity” in the Context of Globalisation]. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiia [Culture and Civilization], 9 (1-1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.25799/AR.2019.44.L002 (in Russian).
5. 5. Drobizheva, L. M., & Ryzhova, S. V. (2015). Grazhdanskaia i etnicheskaia identichnost’ i obraz zhelaemogo gosudarstva v Rossii [Civic and Ethnic Identity and Perception of the Preferable State in Russia]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia [Polis. Political Studies], (5), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.03 (in Russian).
6. 6. Zharkova, E. S. (2016). Identichnost’ cheloveka v sovremennom mire. Problema vzaimosviazi personal’noi i kollektivnoi identichnosti [Human Identity in the Modern World. The Problem of the Relationship between Personal and Collective Identity]. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki [News of Higher Schools. Series “Humanities”], 7 (2), 150–152 (in Russian).
7. 7. Stat’ia 67.1: Konstitutsiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii (priniata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 s izmeneniiami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiiskogo golosovaniia 01.07.2020) [Article 67.1: The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote on 12.12.1993 with amendments approved during a nationwide vote on 01.07.2020)]. (n. d.). SPS «Konsul’tantPlius» [ConsultantPlus]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/95c44edbe33a9a2c1d5b4030c70b6e046060b0e8/ (in Russian).
8. 8. Institut strategii razvitija obrazovanija RAO [Institute for Strategy and Theory of Education of the Russian Academy of Education]. (n. d.). Kontseptsiia prepodavaniia uchebnogo kursa «Istoriia Rossii» v obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiiakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii, realizuiushchikh osnovnye obshcheobrazovatel’nye programmy: Utverzhdena resheniem Kollegii Ministerstva prosveshcheniia Rossiiskoi Federatsii protokol ot 23 oktiabria 2020 g. № PK-lvn. 101 s. [The Concept of Teaching the Training Course “History of Russia” in Educational Institutions of the Russian Federation Implementing Basic General Education Programs: Approved by the Decision of the Board of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, Protocol No. PC-lvn dated October 23, 2020. 101 p.]. Retrieved from http://www.instrao.ru/images/concept/Kontseptsiya_po_Istorii.pdf (in Russian).
9. 9. Fond «Obshchestvennoe mnenie» [Public Opinion Fund]. (2020, September 3). Kriterii patriotizma. Nado li byt’ patriotom? I chto dlia etogo nuzhno? [Patriotism’s Measures. Should You Be a Patriot? And What You Need to Do?] Retrieved from https://fom.ru/TSennosti/14446 (in Russian).
10. 10. Kuznetsova, E. V. (2010). Identichnost’ sovremennogo sub’’ ekta: postanovka problemy [Identity of the Modern Subject: Problem Statement]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Ceriia: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophy], (4-5), 42–46 (in Russian).
11. 11. Loshkareva-Imgrunt, S. I. (2014). «Identichnost’» i «Identifikatsiia»: semanticheskie grani poniatii [Identity and Identification: Semantics of Definitions]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniia [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], (11), 16–20 (in Russian).
12. 12. Ob utverzhdenii Strategii gosudarstvennoi kul’turnoi politiki na period do 2030 goda: Rasporiazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 29.02.2016 № 326-r (red. ot 30.03.2018). 36 s. [On the approval of the Strategy of the State Cultural Policy for the Period up to 2030: Order of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated February 29, 2016, No. 326-r (as Amended on March 30, 2018). 36 p.]. (n. d.). SPS «Konsul’tantPlius» [ConsultantPlus]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_194820/f62ee45faefd8e2a11d6d88941ac66824f848bc2/ (in Russian).
13. 13. O Strategii gosudarstvennoi natsional’noi politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2025 goda: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 19.12.2012 № 1666 (red. ot 06.12.2018). 21 s. [On the Strategy of the National Policy of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2025: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 19, 2012, No. 1666 (as Amended on December 6, 2018). 21 p.]. (n. d.). SPS «Konsul’tantPlius» [ConsultantPlus]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_139350/ (in Russian).
14. 14. Sergeichik, E. M. (2016). Istoricheskaia identichnost’: territoriia i karta [Historical Identities: Territory and Map]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 17: Filosofiia. Konfliktologiia. Kul’turologiia. Religiovedenie [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. Philosophy. Conflict Studies. Culture Studies. Religious Studies], (1), 63–71 (in Russian).
15. 15. Tomsinov, V. A. (2011). Delo o memoriale tsesarevicha Nikolaia Aleksandrovicha v Nitstse (stat’ia chetvertaia) [Cesarevitch Nikolay Aleksandrovich’s Nice Memorial Case (Forth Article)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 11: Pravo [The Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11: Law], (4), 16–35 (in Russian).
16. 16. Domanska, M. (2019, December 31). The Myth of the Great Patriotic War as a Tool of the Kremlin’s Great Power Policy. OSW: Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved from https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-12-31/myth-great-patriotic-war-a-tool-kremlins-great-power-policy
17. 17. Wijermars, M. (2020). Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia; Television, Cinema and the State. London; New York: Routledge. 258 p.
Download file .pdf 299.63 kb